cartel: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	group Weight: 0.56 , form Weight: 0.48 , act Weight: 0.48 , thing Weight: 0.46 , gang Weight: 0.46
Siblings	terrorist organization Weight: 0.32 , militia Weight: 0.31 , mafia Weight: 0.31 , functional group Weight: 0.31 , clan Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
has quality wrong	0.87
has quality use	0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(gang, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(cartel, has quality bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(cartel, has quality bad)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(cartel, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(cartel, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(act, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(gang, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(group, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(gang, has quality bad)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(terrorist organization, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(mafia, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(gang, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(cartel, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(cartel, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(cartel, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(cartel, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(mafia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(mafia, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(terrorist organization, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(terrorist organization, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(cartel, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(cartel, has quality use)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(cartel, has quality good)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(cartel, has quality use)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(cartel, has quality use)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cartel, has quality good)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(cartel, has quality good)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(cartel, has quality wrong)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality good)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(cartel, has quality wrong)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(cartel, has quality wrong)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality wrong)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(cartel, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(act, has quality good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(gang, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(terrorist organization, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(mafia, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(gang, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(act, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(cartel, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(group, has quality good)