cash: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debit card
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.59
, information
Weight: 0.59
, investment
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.33
, financial
Weight: 0.32
, smart card
Weight: 0.32
, stock
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality bad 0.90
be better than bitcoin 0.86
be better than credit 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cash, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(debit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cash, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(debit card, be better than credit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cash, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(debit card, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(debit card, be better than credit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(debit card, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(debit card, be better than credit)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cash, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(debit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cash, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(debit card, be better than credit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cash, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(savings account, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(savings account, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cash, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cash, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cash, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cash, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cash, be better than bitcoin)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(cash, be better than bitcoin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cash, be better than credit)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cash, be better than bitcoin)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cash, be better than bitcoin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cash, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cash, be better than credit)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cash, be better than credit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cash, be better than credit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cash, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cash, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(debit card, be better than credit)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(debit card, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(savings account, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(debit card, be better than credit)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cash, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(debit card, has quality bad)