investment: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	financial institution Weight: 0.62 , business activity Weight: 0.61 , strategy Weight: 0.58 , concept Weight: 0.58
Siblings	savings account Weight: 0.67 , currency Weight: 0.62 , purchase Weight: 0.61 , stock Weight: 0.61 , advertising Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
has quality better	0.90
has quality use	0.86
has quality worth	0.82
has quality cost	0.81
has quality evil	0.80
be bad days	0.77
is good thing	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(strategy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be bad days)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(currency, has quality use)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(investment, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(investment, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(savings account, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(savings account, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(savings account, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(currency, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(currency, has quality use)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(advertising, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(advertising, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality bad)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality cost)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(advertising, be bad days)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(investment, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(investment, has quality good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(investment, is good thing)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(investment, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(investment, is good thing)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(investment, is good thing)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(investment, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(currency, has quality use)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(savings account, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(savings account, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(advertising, has quality cost)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(advertising, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(advertising, be bad days)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(advertising, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)