advertising: has quality cost

Related concepts

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , business activity Weight: 0.62 , investment Weight: 0.60 , content Weight: 0.59
Siblings	advertising agency Weight: 0.71 , revenue Weight: 0.34 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , automobile industry Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality cost	1.00
has quality worth	0.85
has quality standard	0.83
has quality good	0.82
be equal to cost	0.82
equal cost	0.82
has quality bad	0.81
be equal to marginal cost	0.78
equal marginal cost	0.78
be less than price	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(advertising, has quality cost)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(industry, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(advertising, has quality cost)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(advertising, has quality cost)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(investment, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(advertising, has quality cost)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(investment, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(industry, has quality standard)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(investment, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality standard)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be less than price)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(revenue, equal marginal cost)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be equal to marginal cost)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be equal to cost)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(revenue, equal cost)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(revenue, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(industry, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality cost)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality cost)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(investment, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality cost)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(revenue, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(revenue, has quality good)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(revenue, equal cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(revenue, equal cost)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(revenue, be less than price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(revenue, be less than price)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(revenue, be equal to cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(revenue, be equal to cost)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(revenue, equal marginal cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(revenue, equal marginal cost)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(revenue, be equal to marginal cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(revenue, be equal to marginal cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(advertising, has quality cost)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality bad)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(advertising, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(advertising, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality bad)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(advertising, has quality good)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(advertising, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(advertising, has quality cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(revenue, be less than price)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(revenue, equal marginal cost)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(revenue, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(revenue, equal cost)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(revenue, be equal to cost)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(revenue, be equal to marginal cost)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(advertising, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)