cashier: be at fast-food restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, people
Weight: 0.55
, customer
Weight: 0.55
, grocery store
Weight: 0.54
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, convenience store
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, supermarket
Weight: 0.34
, food store
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fast-food restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 1.00
be at in restaurant 0.99
be find in restaurant 0.94
be at resturant 0.85
be at cafe 0.85
serve customer in restaurant 0.84
serve diner 0.83
service to person in restaraunt 0.81
be at hotel 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(customer, be find in restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(clerk, be at hotel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(clerk, be at hotel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(waiter, service to person in restaraunt)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at in restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be find in restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at cafe)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(waiter, serve diner)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(waiter, be at in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(waiter, be at in restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(waiter, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(waiter, be at restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(waiter, be find in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(waiter, be find in restaurant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(waiter, serve customer in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(waiter, serve diner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(waiter, serve diner)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(waiter, be at cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waiter, be at cafe)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(waiter, be at resturant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(clerk, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(clerk, be at hotel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(clerk, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(clerk, be at hotel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(waiter, service to person in restaraunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(waiter, service to person in restaraunt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(customer, be find in restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(waiter, be at restaurant)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(waiter, be at in restaurant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(waiter, be find in restaurant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(waiter, be at resturant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(waiter, serve diner)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(waiter, be at cafe)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(clerk, be at hotel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(waiter, service to person in restaraunt)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(clerk, be at hotel)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cashier, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(customer, be find in restaurant)