cashier: wear aprons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, position
Weight: 0.56
, occupation
Weight: 0.56
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, customer
Weight: 0.55
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, janitor
Weight: 0.34
, receptionist
Weight: 0.33
, bartender
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear aprons 1.00
wear gloves 0.83
wear rubber gloves 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear aprons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(cashier, wear aprons)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cashier, wear gloves)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cashier, wear rubber gloves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cashier, wear gloves)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(cashier, wear rubber gloves)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cashier, wear gloves)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cashier, wear rubber gloves)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cashier, wear gloves)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cashier, wear rubber gloves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cashier, wear aprons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cashier, wear aprons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cashier, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(waiter, wear aprons)