cashier: wear rubber gloves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, position
Weight: 0.56
, occupation
Weight: 0.56
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, customer
Weight: 0.55
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, janitor
Weight: 0.34
, receptionist
Weight: 0.33
, bartender
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear rubber gloves 1.00
wear gloves 0.93
wear aprons 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear aprons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(cashier, wear rubber gloves)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cashier, wear gloves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cashier, wear gloves)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cashier, wear aprons)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cashier, wear gloves)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cashier, wear gloves)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cashier, wear aprons)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(cashier, wear aprons)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cashier, wear aprons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cashier, wear rubber gloves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cashier, wear rubber gloves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cashier, wear rubber gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(waiter, wear aprons)