cataract: is treated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.66
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.66
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, disease
Weight: 0.59
Siblings glaucoma
Weight: 0.36
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.36
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.35
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is treated 1.00
be treated 0.99
be treated in medicine 0.85
be treated by doctors 0.85
were treated in ages 0.83
be due to acute salpingitis treated 0.82
be treated with weed 0.80
were treated in victorian times 0.80
be treated in alternative medicine 0.79
were treated in medieval time 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(disease, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cataract, is treated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(disease, be treated in medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cataract, is treated)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cataract, is treated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(disease, were treated in medieval time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cataract, is treated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(disease, be treated)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(disease, be treated in medicine)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(disease, were treated in medieval time)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(disease, be treated in medicine)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(disease, be treated)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in medieval time)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated by doctors)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated in medicine)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated in alternative medicine)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated with weed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(disease, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cataract, is treated)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(disease, be treated in medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cataract, is treated)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cataract, is treated)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(disease, were treated in medieval time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cataract, is treated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated with weed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, be treated with weed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated in medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, be treated in medicine)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated by doctors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, be treated by doctors)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(glaucoma, be treated in alternative medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, be treated in alternative medicine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cataract, is treated)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in medicine)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be treated in alternative medicine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cataract, be treated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cataract, be treated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cataract, be treated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cataract, be treated)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cataract, be treated in medicine)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cataract, be treated in medicine)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cataract, be treated in alternative medicine)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated in medicine)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cataract, be treated in alternative medicine)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cataract, be treated in alternative medicine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cataract, is treated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(disease, be treated)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in medieval time)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(disease, be treated in medicine)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in victorian times)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(glaucoma, be treated in medicine)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(glaucoma, be treated by doctors)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(glaucoma, be treated with weed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(glaucoma, be treated in alternative medicine)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(disease, be treated)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in medieval time)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(disease, be treated in medicine)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cataract, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in victorian times)