celebrity: wear makeup

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.58
Siblings movie star
Weight: 0.73
, grace kelly
Weight: 0.69
, stephen hawking
Weight: 0.68
, bob hope
Weight: 0.67
, bob dylan
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear makeup 1.00
wear 0.84
wear clothes 0.84
wear wigs 0.83
wear weird clothes 0.82
wear clothing 0.82
wear once clothes 0.82
wear face masks 0.80
wear designer clothes 0.80
wear sunglasses 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(celebrity, wear makeup)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, wear wigs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(celebrity, wear wigs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(celebrity, wear wigs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(celebrity, wear wigs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(celebrity, wear sunglasses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, wear makeup)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(celebrity, wear makeup)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(movie star, wear sunglasses)