celebrity: wear wigs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.58
Siblings movie star
Weight: 0.73
, grace kelly
Weight: 0.69
, stephen hawking
Weight: 0.68
, bob hope
Weight: 0.67
, bob dylan
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear wigs 1.00
wear hats 0.85
wear clothes 0.85
wear weird clothes 0.83
wear 0.83
wear clothing 0.83
wear makeup 0.83
wear sunglasses 0.82
wear masks 0.82
wear once clothes 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(celebrity, wear wigs)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(celebrity, wear makeup)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(celebrity, wear makeup)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(celebrity, wear makeup)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, wear makeup)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, wear wigs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(celebrity, wear wigs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(movie star, wear sunglasses)