cgi: look better on big screen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
look better on big screen 1.00
look better on screen 0.97
use screen 0.86
be green screen 0.85
use green screen 0.84
look better 0.84
look worse on tv 0.80
compared to big movies 0.78
looks on tv 0.77
look worse 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cgi, use screen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(cgi, look better on screen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look better on screen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cgi, look worse on tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look worse on tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cgi, look worse on tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(cgi, looks on tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cgi, look better on screen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(cgi, looks on tv)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cgi, looks on tv)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be green screen)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cgi, use green screen)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cgi, look better on screen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cgi, be green screen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cgi, use green screen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cgi, looks on tv)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cgi, be green screen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cgi, use green screen)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cgi, use green screen)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cgi, look worse on tv)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cgi, look better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(cgi, look better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look worse)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cgi, look better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cgi, look worse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cgi, look worse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cgi, be green screen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(cgi, use screen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, compared to big movies)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, look worse)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cgi, use screen)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cgi, use screen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look better on big screen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)