cgi: look worse on tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents script
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.45
, technology
Weight: 0.45
, partner
Weight: 0.44
Siblings daemon
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31
, text
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
look worse on tv 1.00
look worse 0.89
looks on tv 0.88
get worse 0.85
be expensive for tv 0.85
look better 0.82
look better on screen 0.80
look better on big screen 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cgi, look worse on tv)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(cgi, looks on tv)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(cgi, looks on tv)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cgi, looks on tv)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cgi, looks on tv)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cgi, be expensive for tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cgi, be expensive for tv)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cgi, be expensive for tv)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look worse)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cgi, look worse)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cgi, look worse)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cgi, look better on big screen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(cgi, look better on big screen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look better on big screen)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(cgi, get worse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(cgi, get worse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(cgi, look better on screen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look better on screen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cgi, look better on screen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cgi, look worse)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(cgi, look better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cgi, be expensive for tv)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cgi, look better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cgi, look better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cgi, get worse)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cgi, look better on big screen)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cgi, look better on screen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cgi, get worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cgi, look worse on tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cgi, look worse on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cgi, look worse on tv)