chameleon: has physical part horns

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.63
, reptile
Weight: 0.60
, lizard
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, animal
Weight: 0.51
Siblings creature
Weight: 0.33
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.33
, frog
Weight: 0.33
, red fox
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part horns 1.00
has physical part tongues 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, has physical part horns)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(dinosaur, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, has physical part horns)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(chameleon, has physical part horns)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(chameleon, has physical part tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part horns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(chameleon, has physical part horns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dinosaur, has physical part horns)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part tongues)