chameleon: has physical part tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.63
, reptile
Weight: 0.60
, lizard
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, animal
Weight: 0.51
Siblings creature
Weight: 0.33
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.33
, frog
Weight: 0.33
, red fox
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tongues 1.00
have long tongues 0.93
has tongue 0.85
has physical part eyes 0.79
has physical part skin 0.78
has physical part horns 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reptile, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chameleon, has physical part tongues)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(reptile, has physical part skin)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(reptile, has physical part skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(great horned owl, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, has physical part horns)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reptile, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(great horned owl, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(great horned owl, has physical part eyes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(dinosaur, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, has physical part horns)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(frog, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(chameleon, has physical part tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, have long tongues)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chameleon, has physical part skin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chameleon, has physical part eyes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part eyes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(chameleon, has physical part skin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part skin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part horns)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(chameleon, has physical part horns)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(chameleon, has physical part eyes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(chameleon, has physical part horns)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(chameleon, has physical part eyes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(chameleon, has physical part skin)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(chameleon, has physical part horns)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(chameleon, have long tongues)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chameleon, have long tongues)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chameleon, have long tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chameleon, has physical part tongues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(reptile, has physical part skin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(great horned owl, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dinosaur, has physical part horns)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(reptile, has physical part skin)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)