frog: has physical part skin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, tree frog
Weight: 0.65
, amphibian
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, turtle
Weight: 0.39
, toad
Weight: 0.39
, saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, otter
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part skin 1.00
has state skin 0.90
need skin 0.88
eat skin 0.85
have wet skin 0.83
have thin skin 0.83
have smooth skin 0.81
breathe through skin 0.81
have colorful skin 0.81
have loose skin 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(amphibian, need skin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(amphibian, breathe through skin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(amphibian, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reptile, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(reptile, eat skin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part skin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(reptile, has physical part skin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(reptile, eat skin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(amphibian, need skin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(amphibian, breathe through skin)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(reptile, has physical part skin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(reptile, eat skin)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, breathe through skin)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, need skin)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(toad, has physical part skin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lizard, eat skin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(toad, eat skin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(turtle, has physical part skin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(amphibian, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reptile, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(amphibian, need skin)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(amphibian, breathe through skin)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(reptile, eat skin)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(toad, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(toad, has physical part skin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(turtle, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(turtle, has physical part skin)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(toad, eat skin)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(toad, eat skin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lizard, eat skin)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lizard, eat skin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(frog, has physical part skin)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(frog, need skin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(frog, need skin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(frog, need skin)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(frog, need skin)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(frog, have thin skin)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(frog, have thin skin)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(frog, have thin skin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part skin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(reptile, has physical part skin)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(amphibian, need skin)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(reptile, eat skin)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(amphibian, breathe through skin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(toad, eat skin)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(toad, has physical part skin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(turtle, has physical part skin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lizard, eat skin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(reptile, has physical part skin)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(amphibian, need skin)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(reptile, eat skin)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(amphibian, breathe through skin)