frog: have thin skin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, tree frog
Weight: 0.65
, amphibian
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, turtle
Weight: 0.39
, toad
Weight: 0.39
, saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, otter
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thin skin 1.00
need skin 0.85
have wet skin 0.84
has state skin 0.84
eat skin 0.83
has physical part skin 0.83
have moist skin 0.82
have smooth skin 0.82
need moist skin 0.82
is skin moist 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(frog, have thin skin)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(amphibian, need moist skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(frog, have thin skin)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(amphibian, is skin moist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(frog, have thin skin)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(amphibian, need skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(frog, have thin skin)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(frog, have thin skin)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(amphibian, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(frog, have thin skin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reptile, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(frog, have thin skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(reptile, eat skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(frog, have thin skin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(reptile, eat skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(reptile, has physical part skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(amphibian, need skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(amphibian, need moist skin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(amphibian, is skin moist)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(reptile, eat skin)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(reptile, has physical part skin)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is skin moist)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, need moist skin)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, need skin)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lizard, eat skin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(toad, eat skin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(toad, has physical part skin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(turtle, has physical part skin)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have moist skin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(frog, have thin skin)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(amphibian, need skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(frog, have thin skin)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(amphibian, need moist skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(frog, have thin skin)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(amphibian, is skin moist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(frog, have thin skin)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(frog, have thin skin)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(amphibian, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(frog, have thin skin)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reptile, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(frog, have thin skin)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(reptile, eat skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(frog, have thin skin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(toad, eat skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(toad, eat skin)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lizard, eat skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lizard, eat skin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(toad, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(toad, has physical part skin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(turtle, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(turtle, has physical part skin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(lizard, have moist skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(lizard, have moist skin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(frog, have thin skin)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(frog, need skin)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(frog, need skin)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(frog, has physical part skin)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(frog, need skin)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(frog, have moist skin)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(frog, have moist skin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(frog, have moist skin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(frog, need skin)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(frog, have moist skin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(frog, have thin skin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(amphibian, need skin)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(reptile, has physical part skin)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(reptile, eat skin)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(amphibian, need moist skin)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(amphibian, is skin moist)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(amphibian, have moist skin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(toad, eat skin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lizard, eat skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(toad, has physical part skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(turtle, has physical part skin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lizard, have moist skin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(amphibian, need skin)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(reptile, has physical part skin)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(reptile, eat skin)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(amphibian, need moist skin)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(amphibian, is skin moist)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(frog, have thin skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(amphibian, have moist skin)