chameleon: have long tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.63
, reptile
Weight: 0.60
, lizard
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, animal
Weight: 0.51
Siblings creature
Weight: 0.33
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.33
, frog
Weight: 0.33
, red fox
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long tongues 1.00
has physical part tongues 0.93
has tongue 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chameleon, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chameleon, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(chameleon, have long tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(chameleon, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chameleon, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(chameleon, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(chameleon, has physical part tongues)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chameleon, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, has physical part tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(chameleon, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chameleon, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, have long tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chameleon, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chameleon, have long tongues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chameleon, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part tongues)