champagne: be served in glass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents white wine
Weight: 0.74
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.62
, bottle
Weight: 0.58
, drink
Weight: 0.57
Siblings glass bottle
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, red wine
Weight: 0.36
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served in glass 1.00
be served in glasses 0.88
be served in different glasses 0.88
be served in fluted glass 0.88
be served cold 0.88
be in glass 0.87
is glass 0.86
be made of glass 0.85
be served in sized glasses 0.85
be served in different sized glasses 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(white wine, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(champagne, be served in glass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(champagne, be served in glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(drink, be in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(champagne, be served in glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(bottle, be made of glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(champagne, be served in glass)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served in glass)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(drink, be in glass)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(bottle, be made of glass)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served in glass)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(drink, be in glass)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bottle, be made of glass)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served in glass)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served in glasses)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served in different sized glasses)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, be made of glass)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, is glass)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(white wine, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served in glass)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served in glass)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(drink, be in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served in glass)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(bottle, be made of glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served in glass)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(red wine, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served in glass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(wine bottle, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, is glass)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(wine bottle, be made of glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, be made of glass)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(red wine, be served in different sized glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served in different sized glasses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(red wine, be served in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served in glasses)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(red wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(champagne, be served in glass)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served in fluted glass)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(champagne, be served in fluted glass)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(champagne, be served in fluted glass)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in fluted glass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(champagne, be served in glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(white wine, be served in glass)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(drink, be in glass)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bottle, be made of glass)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(white wine, be served cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red wine, be served in glass)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(wine bottle, is glass)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wine bottle, be made of glass)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(red wine, be served in different sized glasses)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(red wine, be served in glasses)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(red wine, be served cold)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(white wine, be served in glass)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(drink, be in glass)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bottle, be made of glass)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(white wine, be served cold)