white wine: be served cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.70
, red wine
Weight: 0.66
, liquid
Weight: 0.64
, tasting
Weight: 0.62
Siblings champagne
Weight: 0.74
, red
Weight: 0.38
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.37
, vodka
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served cold 1.00
be served chilled 0.89
be served in glass 0.88
be served in small glass 0.85
is cold 0.81
be served wine at room temperature 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(red wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(white wine, be served cold)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beverage, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(white wine, be served cold)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(red wine, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(white wine, be served cold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served in glass)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(beverage, is cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served cold)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(beverage, is cold)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served in glass)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(red wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served cold)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beverage, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served cold)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(red wine, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served chilled)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served in glass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(white wine, be served cold)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(white wine, be served in glass)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served in glass)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(white wine, be served in glass)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(white wine, be served chilled)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(white wine, be served in small glass)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served in small glass)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(white wine, be served in small glass)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served in small glass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(white wine, is cold)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(white wine, is cold)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served in glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(white wine, is cold)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(white wine, be served wine at room temperature)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(white wine, is cold)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(white wine, be served wine at room temperature)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served wine at room temperature)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served wine at room temperature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(white wine, be served cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red wine, be served in glass)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(red wine, be served cold)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(beverage, is cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(champagne, be served chilled)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(champagne, be served in glass)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red wine, be served in glass)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(red wine, be served cold)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(beverage, is cold)