champagne: be served chilled

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents white wine
Weight: 0.74
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.62
, bottle
Weight: 0.58
, drink
Weight: 0.57
Siblings glass bottle
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, red wine
Weight: 0.36
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served chilled 1.00
be served cold 0.89
be served warm 0.88
be best served ice cold 0.84
be served on hot days 0.83
be served in glass 0.83
chilled in japan 0.83
be served wine at room temperature 0.82
be served on days 0.81
be served room temperature 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(champagne, be served chilled)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(champagne, be served chilled)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(white wine, be served wine at room temperature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(champagne, be served chilled)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(white wine, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(champagne, be served chilled)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served in glass)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served cold)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served wine at room temperature)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served in glass)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served wine at room temperature)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served in glass)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served warm)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served cold)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served room temperature)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served chilled)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(white wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served chilled)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(white wine, be served wine at room temperature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served chilled)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(white wine, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served chilled)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(red wine, be served in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served in glass)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(red wine, be served room temperature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served room temperature)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(red wine, be served cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served cold)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(red wine, be served warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served warm)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(champagne, be served chilled)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served in glass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(champagne, be served in glass)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(champagne, be served in glass)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(champagne, be served chilled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(white wine, be served in glass)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(white wine, be served cold)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(white wine, be served wine at room temperature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red wine, be served in glass)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red wine, be served room temperature)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(red wine, be served cold)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(red wine, be served warm)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(white wine, be served in glass)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(white wine, be served cold)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(champagne, be served chilled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(white wine, be served wine at room temperature)