white wine: be served chilled

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.70
, red wine
Weight: 0.66
, liquid
Weight: 0.64
, tasting
Weight: 0.62
Siblings champagne
Weight: 0.74
, red
Weight: 0.38
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.37
, vodka
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served chilled 1.00
is chilled 0.92
have chilled 0.91
be served cold 0.89
be served in glass 0.83
be served wine at room temperature 0.82
be served in small glass 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(red wine, be served cold)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red wine, is chilled)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(red wine, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(white wine, be served chilled)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served in glass)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red wine, is chilled)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(red wine, be served cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served in glass)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(red wine, is chilled)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be served cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red wine, is chilled)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(red wine, be served cold)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(red wine, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(champagne, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served chilled)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(champagne, be served in glass)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(champagne, be served in glass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(white wine, be served chilled)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(white wine, have chilled)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(white wine, be served in glass)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, is chilled)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served in glass)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served in small glass)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served cold)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(white wine, be served in glass)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(white wine, be served in small glass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served in glass)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served wine at room temperature)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(white wine, is chilled)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served in small glass)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(white wine, is chilled)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(white wine, have chilled)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(white wine, is chilled)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(white wine, have chilled)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(white wine, be served in small glass)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(white wine, be served cold)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served cold)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(white wine, have chilled)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(white wine, be served cold)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(white wine, be served wine at room temperature)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(white wine, be served wine at room temperature)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(white wine, be served wine at room temperature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(white wine, be served chilled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red wine, be served in glass)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red wine, is chilled)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(red wine, be served cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(champagne, be served chilled)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(champagne, be served in glass)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red wine, be served in glass)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red wine, is chilled)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(white wine, be served chilled)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(red wine, be served cold)