cheating: CAN illegal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, act
Weight: 0.57
, action
Weight: 0.56
, sin
Weight: 0.55
Siblings infidelity
Weight: 0.34
, adultery
Weight: 0.33
, bullying
Weight: 0.33
, cheater
Weight: 0.33
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
CAN illegal 1.00
is unethical 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is unethical)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(infidelity, is unethical)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cheating, CAN illegal)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(cheating, is unethical)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cheating, is unethical)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cheating, is unethical)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cheating, is unethical)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cheating, CAN illegal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cheating, CAN illegal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is unethical)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cheating, CAN illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(infidelity, is unethical)