infidelity: is unethical

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.62
, behavior
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cheating
Weight: 0.34
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.34
, alcoholism
Weight: 0.33
, jealousy
Weight: 0.33
, loneliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unethical 1.00
is morally wrong 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cheating, is unethical)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cheating, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cheating, is unethical)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(infidelity, is unethical)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is morally wrong)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(infidelity, is morally wrong)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(infidelity, is morally wrong)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(infidelity, is morally wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is unethical)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(infidelity, is unethical)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(cheating, is unethical)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is unethical)