infidelity: is morally wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.62
, behavior
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cheating
Weight: 0.34
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.34
, alcoholism
Weight: 0.33
, jealousy
Weight: 0.33
, loneliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is morally wrong 1.00
has quality wrong 0.80
is unethical 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cheating, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cheating, is unethical)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cheating, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cheating, has quality wrong)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cheating, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cheating, is unethical)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(infidelity, is morally wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(infidelity, has quality wrong)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(infidelity, has quality wrong)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality wrong)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(infidelity, is unethical)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(infidelity, has quality wrong)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(infidelity, is unethical)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(infidelity, is unethical)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is unethical)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is morally wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(infidelity, is morally wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(cheating, is unethical)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is unethical)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cheating, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(infidelity, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)