check: be better than cash

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents account
Weight: 0.63
, application
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cash register
Weight: 0.33
, log
Weight: 0.33
, pocket watch
Weight: 0.33
, business card
Weight: 0.33
, debit card
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than cash 1.00
be made out to cash 0.88
be better than credit 0.82
make money 0.81
be more advantageous than money orders 0.80
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.80
provide source of cash 0.78
be cheaper online than than store 0.78
cost money 0.77
be considered similar to money 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(check, be better than cash)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(check, be better than cash)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(account, provide source of cash)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(check, be better than cash)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(application, make money)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(check, be better than cash)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(check, be better than cash)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(item, cost money)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(check, be better than cash)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(item, cost money)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(application, make money)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(application, cost money)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(account, provide source of cash)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(item, cost money)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(account, provide source of cash)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, cost money)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(application, make money)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(item, be cheaper online than than store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(debit card, be better than credit)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(debit card, be considered similar to money)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(check, be better than cash)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(application, make money)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(check, be better than cash)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(check, be better than cash)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(account, provide source of cash)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(check, be better than cash)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(check, be better than cash)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(item, cost money)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(check, be better than cash)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(debit card, be better than credit)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(debit card, be better than credit)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(debit card, be considered similar to money)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(debit card, be considered similar to money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(check, be better than cash)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(check, be made out to cash)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(check, be made out to cash)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(check, be made out to cash)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(check, be more advantageous than money orders)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(check, be more advantageous than money orders)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(check, be made out to cash)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(check, be more advantageous than money orders)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(check, be more advantageous than money orders)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(check, be better than cash)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(item, cost money)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(application, make money)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(application, cost money)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(account, provide source of cash)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(item, be cheaper online than than store)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(debit card, be considered similar to money)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(debit card, be better than credit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(application, make money)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(item, cost money)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(application, cost money)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(account, provide source of cash)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(item, be cheaper online than than store)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(check, be better than cash)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)