chef: wear tall hats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear tall hats 1.00
wear really tall hats 0.98
wear hats 0.93
wear long hats 0.93
wear funny hats 0.91
is hats 0.89
have hats 0.89
have big hats 0.88
wear hat 0.88
wear white 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cook, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear tall hats)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cook, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear tall hats)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(artist, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear tall hats)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cook, wear tall hats)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(artist, wear hat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cook, wear white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear tall hats)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(artist, wear hat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear white)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cook, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cook, wear white)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(artist, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(waiter, wear white)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear white)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chef, wear tall hats)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chef, wear hats)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chef, wear hats)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chef, wear long hats)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(chef, wear long hats)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(chef, wear hats)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chef, wear long hats)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chef, wear hat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chef, have big hats)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chef, wear hat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chef, have big hats)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chef, wear hat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chef, have big hats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear white)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chef, wear white)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear long hats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear hats)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, have big hats)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear hat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear tall hats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cook, wear tall hats)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(artist, wear hat)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cook, wear white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(painter, wear white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(painter, wear white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(waiter, wear white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cook, wear tall hats)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(artist, wear hat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear tall hats)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cook, wear white)