:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is game)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is played)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chess, be played)
Similarity expansion
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(chess, is played)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chess, is played)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chess, is game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(chess, is game)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chess, is game)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chess, is game)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(chess, be played)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tennis, is played)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tennis, be played)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chess, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tennis, is game)