:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is game)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is played)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(chess, is played)
Similarity expansion
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chess, be played)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chess, is game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chess, be played)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(chess, is game)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chess, is game)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chess, is game)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chess, is played)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tennis, is played)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tennis, be played)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chess, is played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tennis, is game)