chewing gum: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings gum
Weight: 0.60
, eating apple
Weight: 0.33
, banana peel
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32
, glue stick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality bad 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gum, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eating, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(gum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gum, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chewing gum, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chewing gum, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chewing gum, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chewing gum, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(eating, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eating, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gum, has quality bad)