eating: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	habit Weight: 0.63 , activity Weight: 0.63 , thing Weight: 0.62 , ritual Weight: 0.58 , game Weight: 0.58
Siblings	eating apple Weight: 0.36 , eating breakfast Weight: 0.36 , fasting Weight: 0.34 , exercising Weight: 0.34 , bad food Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
is bad for	0.87
be bad on level	0.81
be bad for environment	0.80
be bad day	0.79
be bad on physical level	0.79
be considered bad	0.78
is late bad	0.78
be bad for body	0.76
be bad on keto	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(eating, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(habit, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(eating, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(habit, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(game, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(game, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(fasting, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(exercising, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(eating, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(habit, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(eating, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(fasting, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(fasting, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(exercising, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(exercising, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(eating, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(eating, is bad for)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(eating, is bad for)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(eating, is bad for)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(eating, be bad day)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(eating, be bad for environment)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(eating, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(habit, has quality bad)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(fasting, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(exercising, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(habit, has quality bad)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(eating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)