chicago: be better than york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.67
, atlanta
Weight: 0.67
, illinois
Weight: 0.63
, hot spot
Weight: 0.62
, detroit
Weight: 0.60
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, miami
Weight: 0.35
, indiana
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than york 1.00
be better than new york 0.98
compare to new york 0.89
be more dangerous than nyc 0.83
has more daylight time than new orleans 0.77
be bigger than st louis 0.77
be called chicago 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(chicago, be better than york)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be better than new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be better than new york)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chicago, be better than york)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(chicago, be better than york)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be better than new york)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chicago, compare to new york)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chicago, be better than new york)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chicago, be better than new york)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(chicago, has more daylight time than new orleans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be called chicago)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chicago, be better than new york)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(chicago, be called chicago)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(chicago, compare to new york)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(chicago, be called chicago)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(chicago, be called chicago)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chicago, compare to new york)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(chicago, has more daylight time than new orleans)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chicago, compare to new york)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(chicago, has more daylight time than new orleans)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chicago, has more daylight time than new orleans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be better than york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(chicago, be better than york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(los angeles, be better than new york)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(chicago, be better than york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(los angeles, be better than new york)