chicago: compare to new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.67
, atlanta
Weight: 0.67
, illinois
Weight: 0.63
, hot spot
Weight: 0.62
, detroit
Weight: 0.60
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, miami
Weight: 0.35
, indiana
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to new york 1.00
be better than new york 0.91
be better than york 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, be better than new york)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chicago, compare to new york)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be better than new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be better than new york)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, be better than new york)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chicago, compare to new york)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(chicago, compare to new york)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(chicago, be better than york)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chicago, be better than new york)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be better than new york)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be better than york)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chicago, be better than york)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(chicago, be better than york)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chicago, be better than new york)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chicago, be better than new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chicago, compare to new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chicago, compare to new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(los angeles, be better than new york)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(chicago, compare to new york)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(los angeles, be better than new york)