chicago: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.67
, atlanta
Weight: 0.67
, illinois
Weight: 0.63
, hot spot
Weight: 0.62
, detroit
Weight: 0.60
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, miami
Weight: 0.35
, indiana
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
was such good place do 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(atlanta, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, is great)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is great)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(atlanta, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(atlanta, is great)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is great)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(atlanta, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chicago, is great)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chicago, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(seattle, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(seattle, is great)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ohio, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ohio, is great)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(indiana, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(indiana, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(chicago, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chicago, was such good place do)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chicago, was such good place do)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chicago, was such good place do)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(los angeles, is great)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(atlanta, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(seattle, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(indiana, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ohio, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(los angeles, is great)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(atlanta, is great)