chicago: was such good place do

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.67
, atlanta
Weight: 0.67
, illinois
Weight: 0.63
, hot spot
Weight: 0.62
, detroit
Weight: 0.60
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, miami
Weight: 0.35
, indiana
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was such good place do 1.00
be good place live 0.87
be bad place live 0.86
is great 0.78
be become human bad 0.76
has physical part quick 0.76
care about world 's fair 0.76
be important as state 0.76
look better 0.75
be in mid-west 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(los angeles, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chicago, was such good place do)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(atlanta, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chicago, was such good place do)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(atlanta, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chicago, was such good place do)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(detroit, be become human bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chicago, was such good place do)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chicago, was such good place do)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chicago, was such good place do)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(illinois, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(atlanta, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(detroit, be become human bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(atlanta, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be good place live)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(atlanta, be good place live)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be good place live)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(atlanta, is great)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(detroit, be become human bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(seattle, care about world 's fair)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, look better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(miami, be good place live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good place live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is great)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, has physical part quick)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(los angeles, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chicago, was such good place do)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(atlanta, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chicago, was such good place do)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chicago, was such good place do)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(atlanta, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chicago, was such good place do)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chicago, was such good place do)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(detroit, be become human bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chicago, was such good place do)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(miami, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(miami, be good place live)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ohio, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ohio, be good place live)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(las vegas, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be good place live)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(seattle, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(seattle, be good place live)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(las vegas, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(las vegas, has physical part quick)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(las vegas, look better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(las vegas, look better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(seattle, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(seattle, is great)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ohio, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ohio, is great)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(indiana, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(indiana, is great)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(seattle, care about world 's fair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seattle, care about world 's fair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chicago, was such good place do)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be bad place live)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chicago, be bad place live)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be in mid-west)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(chicago, be in mid-west)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chicago, be in mid-west)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(chicago, be in mid-west)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(chicago, is great)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chicago, be bad place live)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, be bad place live)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chicago, is great)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chicago, was such good place do)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(illinois, be good place live)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(atlanta, be good place live)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(los angeles, be good place live)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(los angeles, is great)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(detroit, be become human bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(atlanta, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(las vegas, look better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(seattle, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(las vegas, has physical part quick)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(las vegas, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(miami, be good place live)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ohio, be good place live)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(seattle, is great)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(indiana, is great)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ohio, is great)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(seattle, care about world 's fair)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(illinois, be good place live)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(atlanta, be good place live)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(los angeles, be good place live)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(los angeles, is great)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(detroit, be become human bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(chicago, was such good place do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(atlanta, is great)