chicken: be at soup

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings salmon
Weight: 0.61
, broiler
Weight: 0.53
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.37
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, hamburger
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at soup 1.00
be ingridient in soup 0.99
be at stew 0.81
be used to eat pudding 0.80
be tasty when fry or bake 0.80
be at dessert 0.80
be at ham sandwich 0.79
be used to meal 0.79
has chicken meat on it 0.78
containe ketchup 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, be used to meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chicken, be at soup)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(dish, be used to eat pudding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chicken, be at soup)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(meat, be at stew) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chicken, be at soup)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chicken, be at soup)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at dessert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chicken, be at soup)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(creature, be at dessert)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(meat, be at stew)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(dish, be used to eat pudding)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(meat, be used to meal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at dessert)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at stew)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dish, be used to eat pudding)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(meat, be used to meal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, containe ketchup)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, be used to meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chicken, be at soup)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(dish, be used to eat pudding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chicken, be at soup)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(meat, be at stew) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chicken, be at soup)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at dessert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chicken, be at soup)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chicken, be at soup)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hamburger, containe ketchup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(hamburger, containe ketchup)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(chicken, be at soup)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chicken, be ingridient in soup)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(chicken, be tasty when fry or bake)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chicken, has chicken meat on it)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be tasty when fry or bake)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(chicken, be tasty when fry or bake)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(chicken, has chicken meat on it)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chicken, has chicken meat on it)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chicken, be tasty when fry or bake)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chicken, has chicken meat on it)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chicken, be at soup)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(meat, be used to meal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat pudding)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(meat, be at stew)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(creature, be at dessert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hamburger, containe ketchup)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(meat, be used to meal)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat pudding)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(meat, be at stew)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chicken, be at soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(creature, be at dessert)