chicken: be ingridient in soup

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings salmon
Weight: 0.61
, broiler
Weight: 0.53
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.37
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, hamburger
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be ingridient in soup 1.00
be at soup 0.99
be at stew 0.81
be used to eat pudding 0.80
be tasty when fry or bake 0.80
be at dessert 0.79
has chicken meat on it 0.79
containe ketchup 0.78
be at ham sandwich 0.78
be used to meal 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, be used to meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(dish, be used to eat pudding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(meat, be at stew) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at dessert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(creature, be at dessert)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(meat, be at stew)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(dish, be used to eat pudding)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(meat, be used to meal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at dessert)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at stew)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dish, be used to eat pudding)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(meat, be used to meal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, containe ketchup)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, be used to meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(dish, be used to eat pudding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(meat, be at stew) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at dessert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hamburger, containe ketchup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(hamburger, containe ketchup)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chicken, be ingridient in soup)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chicken, be at soup)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(chicken, be at soup)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at soup)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(chicken, has chicken meat on it)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(chicken, be tasty when fry or bake)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chicken, be tasty when fry or bake)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chicken, be at soup)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be tasty when fry or bake)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chicken, has chicken meat on it)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chicken, has chicken meat on it)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(chicken, be tasty when fry or bake)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chicken, has chicken meat on it)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(meat, be used to meal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat pudding)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(meat, be at stew)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(creature, be at dessert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hamburger, containe ketchup)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(meat, be used to meal)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(dish, be used to eat pudding)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(meat, be at stew)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(chicken, be ingridient in soup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(creature, be at dessert)