chicken: be expensive in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in canada 1.00
be expensive in korea 0.79
cost in japan 0.77
be in switzerland 0.76
get expensive 0.75
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chicken, be expensive in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chicken, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(chicken, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(chicken, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chicken, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chicken, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(chicken, be expensive in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(chicken, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chicken, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chicken, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chicken, be expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chicken, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)