chickpea: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.64
, ingredient
Weight: 0.58
, seed
Weight: 0.56
, legume
Weight: 0.53
, vegetable
Weight: 0.52
Siblings lentil
Weight: 0.37
, sesame seed
Weight: 0.35
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.35
, sunflower
Weight: 0.35
, tomato
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste 0.95
smell bad 0.79
has quality good 0.79
be good for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chickpea, taste good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chickpea, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(legume, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(legume, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be good for us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(legume, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chickpea, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chickpea, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tomato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tomato, be good for us)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(lentil, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lentil, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(chickpea, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chickpea, taste)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chickpea, taste)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chickpea, taste)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(chickpea, smell bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, smell bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chickpea, smell bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(chickpea, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chickpea, smell bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(chickpea, be good for us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chickpea, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chickpea, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chickpea, be good for us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chickpea, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chickpea, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(legume, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lentil, be good for us)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tomato, be good for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chickpea, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(legume, has quality good)