chinchilla: be at pet store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.63
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.52
, pet
Weight: 0.52
, mink
Weight: 0.46
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35
, kitten
Weight: 0.35
, piglet
Weight: 0.34
, black cat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at pet store 1.00
be find in pet store 0.97
be at pet shop 0.96
be pet 0.94
be used to pet 0.94
be person pet 0.92
be at pet store or alley 0.90
be use as pet 0.90
be keep as pet 0.89
be at pet shelter 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pet, be used to pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be at pet store)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be at pet store)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be at pet store)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be at pet store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(animal, be pet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pet, be used to pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pet, be used to pet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to pet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(llama, be pet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(kitten, be at pet store)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(kitten, be person pet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pet, be used to pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(kitten, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(kitten, be at pet store)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(llama, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(llama, be pet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(kitten, be person pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(kitten, be person pet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be at pet store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be at pet store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pet, be used to pet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(kitten, be at pet store)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(kitten, be person pet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(llama, be pet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pet, be used to pet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(chinchilla, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)