chlamydia: has state viruses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.54
, organism
Weight: 0.33
Siblings syphilis
Weight: 0.35
, gonorrhea
Weight: 0.35
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.34
, genital herpes
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state viruses 1.00
be similar to viruses 0.93
is bacteria 0.81
be different from other bacteria 0.80
is bacterial infection 0.79
is unique bacteria 0.79
is bacterial 0.78
has state disease 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, has state disease)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state disease)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, is bacterial)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(genital herpes, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(syphilis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(syphilis, has state disease)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(gonorrhea, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, has state disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(chlamydia, has state viruses)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is bacteria)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is bacteria)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be different from other bacteria)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is bacteria)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chlamydia, has state disease)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(chlamydia, be different from other bacteria)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, be different from other bacteria)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, has state disease)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is unique bacteria)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state disease)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chlamydia, be different from other bacteria)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is unique bacteria)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(chlamydia, has state disease)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacteria)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is unique bacteria)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is unique bacteria)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chlamydia, has state viruses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, is bacterial)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state disease)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, has state disease)