cinderella: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fairy tale
Weight: 0.71
, princess
Weight: 0.66
, story
Weight: 0.65
, tale
Weight: 0.65
, heroine
Weight: 0.62
Siblings santa claus
Weight: 0.33
, romance
Weight: 0.33
, snow queen
Weight: 0.32
, jonah
Weight: 0.32
, shrek
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
was bad 0.85
is mononoke good 0.83
has quality evil 0.80
has quality joke 0.80
was poor 0.78
is poor 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cinderella, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(princess, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cinderella, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(princess, is mononoke good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cinderella, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(princess, is mononoke good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(princess, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(story, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(princess, is mononoke good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(princess, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(shrek, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(romance, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(snow queen, has quality evil)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shrek, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(shrek, has quality joke)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(princess, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(princess, is mononoke good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(romance, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(romance, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(shrek, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(shrek, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(shrek, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(shrek, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(shrek, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shrek, has quality joke)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(snow queen, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(snow queen, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cinderella, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cinderella, was bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, was bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cinderella, was bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cinderella, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cinderella, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cinderella, was bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cinderella, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(cinderella, was poor)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, was poor)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cinderella, was poor)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cinderella, was poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cinderella, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(princess, is mononoke good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(princess, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(story, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(romance, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shrek, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(shrek, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrek, has quality joke)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(snow queen, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(princess, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(princess, is mononoke good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(story, has quality good)