circulatory system: has quality function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.72
, human body
Weight: 0.59
, artery
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, organism
Weight: 0.56
Siblings aorta
Weight: 0.56
, lymphatic system
Weight: 0.38
, digestive system
Weight: 0.38
, immune system
Weight: 0.37
, respiratory system
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality function 1.00
has quality system 0.82
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(aorta, has quality function)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(aorta, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(aorta, has quality function)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(digestive system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(digestive system, has quality system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(circulatory system, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(circulatory system, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality system)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(aorta, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(circulatory system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)