circulatory system: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.72
, human body
Weight: 0.59
, artery
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, organism
Weight: 0.56
Siblings aorta
Weight: 0.56
, lymphatic system
Weight: 0.38
, digestive system
Weight: 0.38
, immune system
Weight: 0.37
, respiratory system
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality system 0.84
has quality function 0.78
has quality advantage 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(aorta, has quality function)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(digestive system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(digestive system, has quality system)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(aorta, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(aorta, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(circulatory system, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(circulatory system, has quality function)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality function)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality function)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(aorta, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(circulatory system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)