circulatory system: has quality system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.72
, human body
Weight: 0.59
, artery
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, organism
Weight: 0.56
Siblings aorta
Weight: 0.56
, lymphatic system
Weight: 0.38
, digestive system
Weight: 0.38
, immune system
Weight: 0.37
, respiratory system
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality system 1.00
need system 0.85
has quality good 0.84
be different with system 0.83
has quality function 0.82
be related with system 0.81
be similar to system 0.80
works with systems 0.80
be similar to water system 0.79
works with other systems 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(human body, need system)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(human body, need system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tissue, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(human body, need system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(aorta, has quality function)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, has quality system)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(respiratory system, need system)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, need system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(human body, need system)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(digestive system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(digestive system, has quality system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(digestive system, need system)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(digestive system, need system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(respiratory system, need system)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(respiratory system, need system)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(aorta, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(aorta, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(circulatory system, need system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(circulatory system, works with systems)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, be different with system)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, need system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, be similar to water system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality function)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, be related with system)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(circulatory system, need system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, be similar to system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, need system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, works with systems)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, works with other systems)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(circulatory system, be similar to system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(circulatory system, be different with system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, works with systems)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(circulatory system, be similar to water system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(circulatory system, be similar to system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(circulatory system, works with systems)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, be similar to system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(circulatory system, has quality function)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(circulatory system, be related with system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(circulatory system, works with other systems)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(circulatory system, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, be different with system)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, be similar to water system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality function)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality function)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, be related with system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, works with other systems)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(circulatory system, be different with system)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(circulatory system, be related with system)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(circulatory system, works with other systems)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(circulatory system, be similar to water system)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(human body, need system)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(digestive system, need system)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(respiratory system, need system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(digestive system, has quality system)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(aorta, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(human body, need system)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(circulatory system, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)