city: be area of large population

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be area of large population 1.00
be area 0.82
be at rural area 0.79
be more crowd than rural area 0.79
be defined as large city in unite state 0.76
has high crime rate than small town 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(school district, be area)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, be area of large population)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(town, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, be area of large population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(town, be at rural area)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(school district, be area)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(school district, be area)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(school district, be area)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(city, be area of large population)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(town, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(city, be area of large population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(city, be area of large population)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(city, be more crowd than rural area)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(city, has high crime rate than small town)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(city, has high crime rate than small town)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(city, has high crime rate than small town)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(city, has high crime rate than small town)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, be area of large population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, be area of large population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(school district, be area)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(town, be at rural area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(school district, be area)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(city, be area of large population)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(town, be at rural area)