city: be more crowd than rural area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more crowd than rural area 1.00
be at rural area 0.89
be more crowd that country 0.87
be crowd 0.79
be area of large population 0.79
be area 0.78
has high crime rate than small town 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(school district, be area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(town, be at rural area)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(school district, be area)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(school district, be area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(school district, be area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(city, be more crowd than rural area)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(city, be more crowd that country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, be area of large population)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(city, be more crowd that country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(city, has high crime rate than small town)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(city, be more crowd that country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(city, be crowd)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(city, be crowd)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(city, be more crowd that country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(city, has high crime rate than small town)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(city, be crowd)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(city, be crowd)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(city, be crowd)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(city, be crowd)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(city, has high crime rate than small town)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(city, has high crime rate than small town)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, be area of large population)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(city, be crowd)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(city, be crowd)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(city, be area of large population)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(city, be area of large population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(school district, be area)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(town, be at rural area)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(school district, be area)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(town, be at rural area)