town: be at rural area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.69
, community
Weight: 0.69
, school district
Weight: 0.64
, council
Weight: 0.64
Siblings village
Weight: 0.76
, quebec city
Weight: 0.76
, new york city
Weight: 0.73
, city
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at rural area 1.00
be more crowd than rural area 0.89
be area 0.84
be area of large population 0.79
be at countryside 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(school district, be area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(town, be at rural area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(school district, be area)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(school district, be area)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(village, be at rural area)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(village, be at countryside)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, be area of large population)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(school district, be area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(town, be at rural area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(village, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(village, be at rural area)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(village, be at countryside) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(village, be at countryside)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(city, be area of large population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(city, be area of large population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(town, be at rural area)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(town, be at countryside)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(town, be at countryside)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(town, be at countryside)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(town, be at countryside)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(town, be at rural area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(school district, be area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(village, be at rural area)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, be area of large population)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(village, be at countryside)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(town, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(school district, be area)