city: be important for trade

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.71
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, medina
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for trade 1.00
be considered trade 0.92
was such good center of trade 0.88
center of trade 0.86
play role in trade 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(town, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, be important for trade)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(town, center of trade)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(town, center of trade)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be considered trade)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, center of trade)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was such good center of trade)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(town, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(city, be important for trade)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mexico city, be considered trade)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be considered trade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(new york city, was such good center of trade)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(new york city, was such good center of trade)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(mexico city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mexico city, center of trade)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(city, be important for trade)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(city, be considered trade)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(city, be considered trade)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(city, be considered trade)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(city, was such good center of trade)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, was such good center of trade)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(city, was such good center of trade)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(city, center of trade)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(city, center of trade)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(city, center of trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(city, be considered trade)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(city, was such good center of trade)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(city, center of trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(city, be important for trade)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, be important for trade)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(town, center of trade)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(new york city, was such good center of trade)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, center of trade)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mexico city, be considered trade)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(city, be important for trade)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(town, center of trade)