city: center of trade

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.71
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, medina
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
center of trade 1.00
was such good center of trade 0.93
be important for trade 0.86
be considered trade 0.84
play role in trade 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(town, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(city, center of trade)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(town, center of trade)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(town, center of trade)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be considered trade)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, center of trade)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was such good center of trade)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(town, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(city, center of trade)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(mexico city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mexico city, center of trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(new york city, was such good center of trade)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(new york city, was such good center of trade)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mexico city, be considered trade)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be considered trade)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(city, center of trade)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(city, was such good center of trade)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(city, was such good center of trade)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(city, be important for trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(city, be important for trade)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(city, be considered trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(city, be considered trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(city, was such good center of trade)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(city, be important for trade)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(city, be considered trade)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, was such good center of trade)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(city, be considered trade)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, be important for trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(city, center of trade)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(city, center of trade)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(town, center of trade)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(new york city, was such good center of trade)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, center of trade)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mexico city, be considered trade)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(city, center of trade)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(town, center of trade)