city: be known as apple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.71
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, medina
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be known as apple 1.00
be known as big apple 0.96
be called apple 0.93
be called big apple 0.90
be nicknamed apple 0.86
be nicknamed big apple 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called apple)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be known as apple)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called big apple)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed big apple)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(new york city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new york city, be known as apple)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(new york city, be known as big apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(new york city, be called apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called apple)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(new york city, be called big apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called big apple)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed big apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed big apple)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(city, be known as apple)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(city, be called apple)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(city, be called apple)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(city, be nicknamed apple)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(city, be called apple)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(city, be called apple)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(city, be nicknamed apple)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(city, be known as apple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be called apple)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york city, be known as apple)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be called big apple)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be nicknamed big apple)